Skip Navigation

International Journal of Constitutional Law 2005 3(4):680-686; doi:10.1093/icon/moi046
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nohlen, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and New York University School of Law 2005, I·CON, Volume 3, Number 4, 2005, pp. 687–695

Germany: The Electronic Eavesdropping Case

Nicolas Nohlen*

* Law student, Heidelberg University; founder and editor-in-chief of the Heidelberg Student Law Review (STUDZR), the first student-run law journal in Germany (www.HeidelbergStudentLawReview.com); email: Nicos.nohlen{at}studzr.de

Human dignity—inviolability of the home—Constitutional amendments and the Eternity Clause—Interpretation of constitutional amendments—German Constitutional Court rules on the implementation of electronic eavesdropping measures—decision of March 3, 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.